- PureOS-project - Purism Mailing Lists

Testing mailman
by Jeremiah C. Foster 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

This is a test.

2 3

Quick PureOS 11 Codename Voting
by Matthias Klumpp 12 Dec '21

12 Dec '21

Hi! We have a small vote for the next PureOS codename! I picked all suggestions that we had so far and added them to a really simple list. Please, do vote only once per person, but you *can* vote for multiple options if you want to. Whatever has a simple majority by next Friday will win the vote Voting link: https://poll.disroot.org/3rfZurYMKIIzdAv2 Cheers, Matthias

1 1

Fwd: [CFP] Embedded, Mobile and Automotive devroom @FOSDEM2022
by Jeremiah C. Foster 08 Dec '21

08 Dec '21

FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [CFP] Embedded, Mobile and Automotive devroom @FOSDEM2022 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 20:16:54 +0100 From: Krzysztof Opasiak <kopasiak90(a)gmail.com> To: fosdem(a)lists.fosdem.org, embedded-devroom(a)lists.fosdem.org This email is a Call For Participation in the Embedded, Mobile and Automotive Devroom at FOSDEM 2022. Devroom date: 5th & 6th February in FOSDEM Online Venue CFP deadline: Monday, 20th December 2021. Final speaker confirmation on Friday, December 31th 2021. CFP Introduction --------------------------- Embedded software is transforming the world, and FOSS embedded software is leading the way. From automotive to the Internet of Things, launching rockets, messing with your phone or automating your toaster, small devices, embedded systems, and automatons are everywhere Join in and tell the world about your project! This year FOSDEM is going to be an online event. All talks will need to be prerecorded and shared with FOSDEM organizers. Please only propose a talk that you're really able and willing to share. Topics Sought ------------------------ The embedded devroom seeks topics related to automotive, industrial, mobile, consumer electronics, autonomous and generally embedded systems, either from a professional or hobbyist background. Topics such as operating systems (Linux, free RTOS), hardware platforms (from microcontrollers to microprocessors, FPGAs) and software stacks are welcome. Related areas are of course of interest as well and our definition of "embedded" is elastic. CFP Schedule And Submission Details ----------------------------------------------------------- Please submit proposals no later than the 20th of December. Please use the following URL to submit your talk to FOSDEM 2022 https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM22 and follow the following rules: * If you do not have an account yet, please create one, if you have submitted a talk in one of the previous years, please re-use your old account. * Select as the Track "Embedded, mobile and automotive devroom" * Select as the Event Type "Lecture" * Include a title. (Note that "Subtitle" entry doesn't appear on all conference documents, so make sure "Title" can stand on its own without "Subtitle" present.) * Include an Abstract of about 500 characters and a full description of any length you wish, but in both fields, please be concise, but clear and descriptive. * Indicate whether you seek a 25, or 50 minute slot. * Use the "Links" sub-area to your past work in the field you'd like to share. * Also in the notes field please indicate your timezone so that we can schedule a convenient timeslot for you. * Last but not least, make sure you have up to date contact info. Feel free to send an email to the embedded mailing list should you have any questions with the conference system. Subscribe here: https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/embedded-devroom About the devroom organizers -------------------------------------------------- The co-organizers of the FOSDEM 2022 Embedded devroom are (in alphabetical order by surname): * Walt Miner * Krzysztof Opasiak * Thomas Petazzoni * Chris Simmonds * Geert Uytterhoeven _______________________________________________ embedded-devroom mailing list embedded-devroom(a)lists.fosdem.org https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/embedded-devroom

2 1

Updating package gnome-software
by Carsten Schoenert 08 Dec '21

08 Dec '21

Hi, I've taken a look at gnome-software yesterday, originally because the Package Synchronization Issue Overview is showing a greater difference between the version in the archive than available in Debian 3.36.0-3pureos1 vs. 3.38.1-1 https://master.pureos.net/sync/landing Next I was looking at source.p.s to start a deeper look, but there are two repositories for gnome-software! https://source.puri.sm/pureos/packages/gnome-software https://source.puri.sm/pureos/core/gnome-software But in none of both trees I can find preparations for the current version 3.36.0-3pureos1 in byzantium. The first of the two repos seems to be mostly driven by the L5 requirements in the past, the other seems to be modified only by Matthias by one commit in two different branches. To decrease confusion I'd like to drop one of both trees or at least meld them together. This requires consensus what to do or what state to archive. So I want to ask how other members see the situation and which way to take. To me updating the first listed repo seems to cost the smallest amount of time given we would only need (want?) to add the PureOS delta from the current version 3.36.0-3pureos1 in the archive. -- Regards Carsten Schoenert

3 2

Getting Maintainer access on PureOS namespace?
by Carsten Schoenert 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hello, some pre explanation. I worked the past week on localechooser in a same way as done before for cron. I requested adding the git trees of localechooser and python-apt into the deb-build-jobs by this MR https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/deb-build-jobs/-/merge_requests/381 Guido pointed out correctly that the prerequisites aren't fulfilled to accept this MR. To not bother especially Guido again and again to call the helper script 'setup-pureos-pkg-repo' for me I'd like to request to get the role Maintainer for the PureOS namespace on source.p.s.. If I can get a Maintainer permission I'd be able to use the helper script on the git trees within the PureOS repositories and adjust branches etc on my own. The helper script Guido mentioned on several places already can be found on https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/librem5-dev-tools If you don't feel comfortable given that role to me we need to find a workflow how the setup and adjustments on git trees can be done. Otherwise it's a bit stop and go for me as I need to interrupt my work constantly. -- Regards Carsten Schoenert

5 8

Re: [PureOS] Updating localechooser in landing/byzantium
by Jonas Smedegaard 16 Oct '21

16 Oct '21

Quoting Guido Günther (2021-10-09 17:11:27) > Hi, > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:25:20AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > [..snip..] > > > https://source.puri.sm/pureos/packages/lollypop contains no local > > > feature commits (i.e. no feature changes, only boilerplate changes > > > to packaging metadata) so does not illustrate well how to best > > > tackle package upgrades. What it does illustrate is that it > > > didn't preserve earlier PureOS work - i.e. the work tracked at > > > https://source.puri.sm/librem5-apps/lollypop > > > > That is unfortunately correct. :( > > I wasn't aware that there was already a lollypop tree until now. > > Then we need to think about how get that split fixed. > > I wasn't aware of > > https://source.puri.sm/librem5-apps/lollypop > > when importing, sorry. > > We can preserve that history in the pureos/packages/lollypop repo need > be or just leave it as is and use that fork in unlikely case we need > updates for amber-phone. Both works for me. That particular work of mine is not important for me that we preserve. If topic of this conversation is _simplest_ practice then let's just throw away historic git repos. I pointed to that historic git repo because a) it was unclear to me what Carsten wanted to say (he also referenced missing posts by Guido still unavailable to me¹), and b) I mistakenly focused on finding _best_ practice. - Jonas ¹ Seems many posts from Guido has reached only cc'ed participants in discussions, not this list. As a concrete example, this email is a response to an email from Guido with Message-ID <YWGxH0nt5AnmfYO9(a)qwark.sigxcpu.org> which I received but does not appear at https://lists.puri.sm/pipermail/pureos-project/2021-October/thread.html -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private

2 3

Dropping derived cron package?
by Carsten Schoenert 16 Oct '21

16 Oct '21

Hi, back in 2018 Matthias did a small modification within the cron package that resulted in forked tree and small different binary package for cron. Basically the only difference is this patch: > $ git show c2766e7259b86b32bcecd2d61607eb022fd31310 > commit c2766e7259b86b32bcecd2d61607eb022fd31310 > Author: Matthias Klumpp <matthias(a)tenstral.net> > Date: Sun Aug 19 20:50:32 2018 +0200 > > Only suggest, not recommend, an MTA > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index 1bd9c3e..e6a6766 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -25,12 +25,11 @@ Depends: > adduser, > lsb-base (>= 3.0-10), > libpam-runtime (>= 1.0.1-11) > -Recommends: > - exim4 | postfix | mail-transport-agent > Suggests: > anacron (>=2.0-1), > logrotate, > - checksecurity > + checksecurity, > + exim4 | postfix | mail-transport-agent > Breaks: > dpkg (<< 1.15.4) > Provides: cron-daemon In between times the packaging in Debian has been changed on this part. > $ git show f27b9ccdb2046fe3fbb1eef6d7801d4b3d6900c7 > commit f27b9ccdb2046fe3fbb1eef6d7801d4b3d6900c7 > Author: Christian Kastner <ckk(a)debian.org> > Date: Tue Feb 19 21:46:16 2019 +0100 > > Switch cron MTA Recommends to default-mta | mail-transport-agent > > Recommend these virtual packages rather than specific MTAs. > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index fc59f49..609e84f 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Depends: > lsb-base (>= 3.0-10), > libpam-runtime (>= 1.0.1-11) > Recommends: > - exim4 | postfix | mail-transport-agent > + default-mta | mail-transport-agent > Suggests: > anacron (>= 2.0-1), > logrotate, Is this change worth to update the current cron package in byzantium or could the derived package instead get dropped? (It's not completely clear to me why the mta part was moved to Suggests.) -- Regards Carsten Schoenert

3 4

Re: [PureOS] Updating localechooser in landing/byzantium
by Jonas Smedegaard 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

Quoting Guido Günther (2021-10-09 18:06:35) > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 05:50:00PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [..snip..] > > ¹ Seems many posts from Guido has reached only cc'ed participants in > > discussions, not this list. As a concrete example, this email is a > > response to an email from Guido with Message-ID > > <YWGxH0nt5AnmfYO9(a)qwark.sigxcpu.org> which I received but does not > > appear at > > https://lists.puri.sm/pipermail/pureos-project/2021-October/thread.html > > Thanks for making me aware: > > I checked all the mails had the right "From:" so I can't tell why > those gone missing. The mail servers I have access to show no signs of > error an logged those mails as being accepted by > lists.puri.sm[138.201.228.37]:25 Thanks for those details. Now the list has them as well :-/ - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private

2 2

Re: [PureOS] Updating localechooser in landing/byzantium
by Guido Günther 09 Oct '21

09 Oct '21

Hi, On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 06:06:36PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 05:50:00PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [..snip..] > > ¹ Seems many posts from Guido has reached only cc'ed participants in > > discussions, not this list. As a concrete example, this email is a > > response to an email from Guido with Message-ID > > <YWGxH0nt5AnmfYO9(a)qwark.sigxcpu.org> which I received but does not > > appear at > > https://lists.puri.sm/pipermail/pureos-project/2021-October/thread.html > > Thanks for making me aware: > > I checked all the mails had the right "From:" so I can't tell why > those gone missing. The mail servers I have access to show no signs of > error an logged those mails as being accepted by > lists.puri.sm[138.201.228.37]:25 ahh...wait. Does this one reach you? I think I mixed tings up again because I'm subscribed with another mail address. I'll fix that. Cheers, -- Guido > > Cheers, > -- Guido > > > > > -- > > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PureOS-project mailing list > > PureOS-project(a)lists.puri.sm > > https://lists.puri.sm/listinfo/pureos-project >

2 1

Updating localechooser in landing/byzantium
by Carsten Schoenert 09 Oct '21

09 Oct '21

Hi, I've looked at localechooser as it's mentioned currently in the synchronization issues for landing. https://master.pureos.net/sync/landing Last time the package was touched was in 2018 by Matthias and shortly later by Chris [1]. As Matthias choose to start with a standalone branch back in 2018 I now merged the Debian tag 2.93 from the upstream repository on Salsa into a derived branch pureos/latest based on the standalone branch named master within the Purism tree. That's how I see future work will be manageable, merging the required Debian tag into the derived PureOS tree as done in other forked repos. I managed to get the merge conflicts solved so far. I also added a configuration for gbp and also a CI controlling file. So why I'm posting here? Simply because there is no target branch on the destination tree I can create a MR for and also because I'm currently not know much about the background for this forked package. So please have a look at the current state I prepared [2] for further discussion. The CI pipeline succeeded so far. But as for python-apt, other things might be needed to check before pushing my work to the main repo. [1] https://source.puri.sm/pureos/core/localechooser [2] https://source.puri.sm/carsten.schoenert/localechooser/-/commits/pureos/lat… -- Regards Carsten Schoenert

2 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

PureOS-project