Hi, On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, since we're dropping phone specific package for byzantium we also ought to drop `+librem5.X' in the version numbers. Matthias, what would you suggest here so that we generate higher version numbers in byzantium when backporting a package to both amber and byzantium to be consistent whith the rest of PureOS but also have a higher number than the current
<upstream>-<debian-rev)pureos+librem5.<revision>
For the time being addin `+byzN` at the end of the version number will do: 1.0-2pureos+librem5+byzN For new upstream versions we can drop the librem5 postfix since there's no difference between laptop and phone and we can do 1.0-2pureosN for byzantium¹ and 1.0-2pureosN~amberM for amber (when backporting the byzantium version to amber). Does that make sense? Cheers, -- Guido 1) according to https://tracker.pureos.net/w/development/packaging_overview/
Cheers, -- Guido