Bullseye is released, and byzantium seems to get closer and closer to being released - congratulations!
In the Lollypop package there's a bug in the package in byzantium/bullseye which affects the adaptive mode of the application (which is bad for the phone interface of course).
Upstream bug #2778 [1] (fixed in 1.4.19-2 in debian, in upstream in 1.4.20, while 1.4.14-1 is in byzantium/bullseye).
It's two commits upstream [2][3] merged to one patch in the debian fix [4].
If I can, I would like to fix this in byzantium - what's the preferred way to do this?
Cherry-picking the fix and adding to 1.4.14-1, or simply backporting the latest (or maybe just the first one with the fix) to byzantium?
I would gladly provide an updated package.
regards -- Andreas Rönnquist mailinglists@gusnan.se andreas@ronnquist.net
[Please don't CC me, if I mail to a mailinglist, I am subscribed to it.]
1: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/lollypop/-/issues/2778 2: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/lollypop/-/commit/5e0cbc686e3754a5a3c6e05315b... 3: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/lollypop/-/commit/8cd6117a597be5ee276dca7b999... 4: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/lollypop/-/commit/bdad22d541d9...
Hi Andreas,
Quoting Andreas Ronnquist (2021-09-23 13:29:25)
Bullseye is released, and byzantium seems to get closer and closer to being released - congratulations!
Thanks! :-)
In the Lollypop package there's a bug in the package in byzantium/bullseye which affects the adaptive mode of the application (which is bad for the phone interface of course).
Upstream bug #2778 [1] (fixed in 1.4.19-2 in debian, in upstream in 1.4.20, while 1.4.14-1 is in byzantium/bullseye).
It's two commits upstream [2][3] merged to one patch in the debian fix [4].
If I can, I would like to fix this in byzantium - what's the preferred way to do this?
Cherry-picking the fix and adding to 1.4.14-1, or simply backporting the latest (or maybe just the first one with the fix) to byzantium?
I would gladly provide an updated package.
Thanks for the detailed bugreport.
Please re-post to our bugtracker at https://tracker.pureos.net/ if you don't mind. This mailinglist is for general discussions about PureOS and not optimal for tracking bugs.
- Jonas
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 01:29:25PM +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
Bullseye is released, and byzantium seems to get closer and closer to being released - congratulations!
In the Lollypop package there's a bug in the package in byzantium/bullseye which affects the adaptive mode of the application (which is bad for the phone interface of course).
Upstream bug #2778 [1] (fixed in 1.4.19-2 in debian, in upstream in 1.4.20, while 1.4.14-1 is in byzantium/bullseye).
It's two commits upstream [2][3] merged to one patch in the debian fix [4].
If I can, I would like to fix this in byzantium - what's the preferred way to do this?
If the latest version in Debian (1.4.23) is a clean backport, it doesn't need additional dependencies updated and you didn't spot any regressions then I'd file a bug at https://tracker.pureos.net/ stating exactly that. A PureOS developer can then grab the package from Debian and upload it.
If the package would need additional dependencies updated i'd rather go for a backport of the patch you mentioned to 1.4.19-2 and file that at https://tracker.pureos.net/ as well preferably attaching a debdiff of the tested package. A PureOS develoepr can than grab the debdiff and apply it to the PureOS package.
Does that make sense? Cheers, -- Guido
Cherry-picking the fix and adding to 1.4.14-1, or simply backporting the latest (or maybe just the first one with the fix) to byzantium?
I would gladly provide an updated package.
regards -- Andreas Rönnquist mailinglists@gusnan.se andreas@ronnquist.net
[Please don't CC me, if I mail to a mailinglist, I am subscribed to it.]
1: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/lollypop/-/issues/2778 2: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/lollypop/-/commit/5e0cbc686e3754a5a3c6e05315b... 3: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/lollypop/-/commit/8cd6117a597be5ee276dca7b999... 4: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/lollypop/-/commit/bdad22d541d9... _______________________________________________ PureOS-project mailing list PureOS-project@lists.puri.sm https://lists.puri.sm/listinfo/pureos-project
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:00:39 +0200, Guido Güntheragx@sigxcpu.org wrote:
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 01:29:25PM +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
--------------------------------- 8< ---------------------------------
If the latest version in Debian (1.4.23) is a clean backport, it doesn't need additional dependencies updated and you didn't spot any regressions then I'd file a bug at https://tracker.pureos.net/ stating exactly that. A PureOS developer can then grab the package from Debian and upload it.
If the package would need additional dependencies updated i'd rather go for a backport of the patch you mentioned to 1.4.19-2 and file that at https://tracker.pureos.net/ as well preferably attaching a debdiff of the tested package. A PureOS develoepr can than grab the debdiff and apply it to the PureOS package.
Does that make sense?
Thank you, it indeed does - Bug at https://tracker.pureos.net/T1079 .
thanks!
best -- Andreas Rönnquist mailinglists@gusnan.se andreas@ronnquist.net
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 03:16:26PM +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:00:39 +0200, Guido Güntheragx@sigxcpu.org wrote:
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 01:29:25PM +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
--------------------------------- 8< ---------------------------------
If the latest version in Debian (1.4.23) is a clean backport, it doesn't need additional dependencies updated and you didn't spot any regressions then I'd file a bug at https://tracker.pureos.net/ stating exactly that. A PureOS developer can then grab the package from Debian and upload it.
If the package would need additional dependencies updated i'd rather go for a backport of the patch you mentioned to 1.4.19-2 and file that at https://tracker.pureos.net/ as well preferably attaching a debdiff of the tested package. A PureOS develoepr can than grab the debdiff and apply it to the PureOS package.
Does that make sense?
Thank you, it indeed does - Bug at https://tracker.pureos.net/T1079 .
Great. And thanks for maintaining the package in Debian! Chdeers, -- Guido
thanks!
best -- Andreas Rönnquist mailinglists@gusnan.se andreas@ronnquist.net
-
Andreas Ronnquist -
Guido Günther -
Jonas Smedegaard