[Librem-5-dev] Power management issues

[Benjamin Berg]

Hi,

On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 09:20 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:48:53AM +0200, Adrien Plazas via Librem-5-dev wrote:
> >    Hi all,
> >    Benjamin submitted the following issues to me, wondering if we (Purism
> >    devs) would be interested in fixing some of them, here are they:
> >    - [1]https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/issues/88
> >    - [2]https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/issues/78
> >    - [3]https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/232
> >    - [4]https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/200
> >    - [5]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657496
> >    What do you think?
> 
> Thanks for collecting these! As mentioned on matrix I don't think these
> hit us badly atm / can be worked around but as discussed during the
> gnome-settings BoF we will need to put some work in here in the long
> run.

Yeah, kind of expected that, and that is fair.

> On my mental roadmap this is somewhat past proper wwan panel integration
> 
>   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/132
>   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/issues/70
>   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gcr/issues/8
>   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gcr/issues/7

Right, I should have a look at the WWAN module. Even though I don't
really know what to look out for exactly :)

> and proper UI for the kill switches. I wonder if we should use a tag in
> gitlab to track these? The "mobile apps initiative" tag doesn't seem
> 100% right.

Hrm, kill switches. What about
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761051

Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puri.sm/pipermail/librem-5-dev/attachments/20181022/f3d3c8a4/attachment.sig>