Quoting Jeremiah C. Foster (2019-07-09 12:05:12)
On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 08:44 -0300, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Matthias Klumpp (2019-07-08 14:04:20)
Indeed. As a matter of fact, PureOS green is already tracking bullseye at the moment.
Can you then please "hit the breaks" to not contaminate green any further?
I believe this has been done, please see: https://lists.puri.sm/pipermail/pureos-project/2019-July/000157.html
Here's a quote from that email (at the bottom); "P.S: I made a "stale" suite fork of the "green" PureOS suite, so we have a stable-ish point of reference to use, in case we go with having a suite that tracks stable (as green is accumulating packages from Debian testing already)."
Well, Matthias knows best what Matthias has done but I can only read above quotes as a) our users of green will continue to receive Debian testing packages and b) new user can receive Debian stable packages (when an installer is created for that).
Regardless of those details, please stop all migration frmo landing to green to minimize the mess we need to custom-handle!!!
I think a single exclamation point is sufficient. :-)
Why?
Because we don't want to stabilise PureOS now after all?
Or because a bunch of helping hands is getting hired as we speak to help maintain the delta we now create between Debian stable and whenever we stop letting Debian testing packages into green?
- Jonas