On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 08:44 -0300, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Matthias Klumpp (2019-07-08 14:04:20)
[Re-sending, as the mailinglist rejected the previous message for some reason]
Am Mo., 8. Juli 2019 um 16:58 Uhr schrieb Jonas Smedegaard jonas.smedegaard@puri.sm:
Quoting Nicole Faerber (2019-07-08 11:41:13)
[...]
Indeed. As a matter of fact, PureOS green is already tracking bullseye at the moment.
Can you then please "hit the breaks" to not contaminate green any further?
I believe this has been done, please see: https://lists.puri.sm/pipermail/pureos-project/2019-July/000157.html
Here's a quote from that email (at the bottom); "P.S: I made a "stale" suite fork of the "green" PureOS suite, so we have a stable-ish point of reference to use, in case we go with having a suite that tracks stable (as green is accumulating packages from Debian testing already)."
It seems to me that only ~8 hours ago (i.e. after your writing above) did Bullseye receive its first chunk of migrations from unstable - and I believe we also have some days of buffer from landing to green before that change affects our users.
Yes, I think you're right. I haven't seen any new packages come in yet when I do apt update.
Regardless of those details, please stop all migration frmo landing to green to minimize the mess we need to custom-handle!!!
I think a single exclamation point is sufficient. :-)
It would be great to better understand Laniakea and the way it works. This would allow us to better estimate the work involved and to help. It also would help us determine resource needs and get the requisite resources to the work needed. I would really appreciate a discussion in this area and hope to hear from Matthias when he's available for such a discussion.
Regards,
Jeremiah